9/7/2023 0 Comments Crystalmaker getting startedI must however say that I don't really see how your approach would be useful. ![]() To improve the quality, you may in this case want to converge to a lower tolerance than the default (1e-5), just to be sure.Īnd, at the end of the day, to be really sure, you had better do a test to verify this, by simply letting it run, and then start over, interrupt it and restart, and compare the physical quantities (transmission etc). However, if the convergence is stable, the difference should be negligible and just a matter of numerical accuracy. In principle it will converge to a different point, since when you restore you lose the mixing history. "Will this procedure change the point to which the calculation converges? I.e., will it now converge to a different result than if it was left to run flat out all the way?" Perhaps you could share the solution, others might benefit from it too.Ībout the second part, I interpret your question as:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |